[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Author Guidelines::
Ethical::
Advertising Policy::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 14, Issue 4 (11-2021) ::
jccnursing 2021, 14(4): 40-31 Back to browse issues page
Predicting Clinical Outcome in Non-Surgical Patients Referred to the Emergency Department of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Urmia with two Criteria REMS and APACHEIII: A Cross-Sectional study
Hadi Khosh Akhlagh , Fatemeh Rostampour , Omid Garkaz , Pedram Imam Gholizadeh , Hamid Reza Mehryar *
Department of Emergency Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , Hamidrezamehryar2010@gmail.com
Abstract:   (1825 Views)
Background and aim: Health care methods have made undeniable progress in maintaining patients' health, but assessing the expected recovery and health of these methods is still done by basic criteria such as mental estimates and approximate physicians. These methods have a high probability of error in predicting patient mortality and survival. The aim of this study was to investigate the comparison between REMS and APACHEIII criteria in non-surgical patients referred to the emergency department of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Urmia in the second half of 2019.
Methods: In this cross-sectional descriptive study, 662 patients were enrolled in the study by census method. Data were collected by checklist. Finally, the mortality rate was predicted using REMS and APACHE III systems.
Results: The results of the study showed that out of 662 patients (55.9%), 370 were male and (44.1%) were 292 females, the mean age of patients was 62.56±14.61 years. The mean scores of APACHE III and REMS in all patients were 53.32±17.96 and 9.79±4.05, respectively. The mean REMS in living patients was 7.21±3.8 And in deceased patients was 13.29±4.41. Also, a significant direct relationship was observed between APACHE III score (r=0.437) and REMS (r=0.241) with the length of hospital stay. The area below the ROC curve chart for APACHE III was higher than REMS, indicating that APACHE III was better at predicting patients' clinical outcome.
Conclusion: Overall, the APACHE III criterion performed better than the REMS in predicting the clinical outcome of non-surgical patients referred to the emergency department, and the mean scores of REMS and APACHE III were higher in deceased patients than in surviving patients.
Keywords: Emergency, Mortality, REMS, APACHEIII
Full-Text [PDF 1517 kb]   (709 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2021/03/12 | Accepted: 2021/10/18 | Published: 2021/11/3
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: IR.UMSU.REC.1397.213



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khosh Akhlagh H, Rostampour F, Garkaz O, Imam Gholizadeh P, Mehryar H R. Predicting Clinical Outcome in Non-Surgical Patients Referred to the Emergency Department of Imam Khomeini Hospital in Urmia with two Criteria REMS and APACHEIII: A Cross-Sectional study. jccnursing 2021; 14 (4) :40-31
URL: http://jccnursing.com/article-1-549-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License
Volume 14, Issue 4 (11-2021) Back to browse issues page
نشریه پرستاری مراقبت‌ ویژه Journal of Critical Care Nursing
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.02 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710